Hi Tianon, > The main issue with getting it in essentially boils down to gccgo and > upstream Go disagreeing on the GOARCH for mips64el (gccgo uses > "mipsn64"[0]), which makes bootstrapping difficult. > > [0]: https://groups.google.com/d/topic/golang-nuts/waTy56I_KWQ/discussion
Are you saying that the patch is more complex than just s/mipsn64/mips64el/ ? Or are you saying you do not want to maintain such patch until upstream add an alias for mips64el ? Thanks
