Hi, On Sun, 2025-11-02 at 14:44 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: > On 11/1/25 3:03 PM, Ansgar π wrote: > > nobody opposed the removal of mips64el (#1105972) or armel (#1113679) > > from unstable nor did anyone want to move either architecture to ports. > > So I guess we can go ahead with the removal. > > > > w-b team: Could you please disable buildds for mips64el and armel for > > Debian unstable and experimental? > I think that's done. AurΓ©lien disabled the distributions on the buildds > and I turned off the relevant wanna-build bits. We should no longer be > ingesting it and the data has been pruned from the database (which > dictates what is being looked at).
Thanks. Both armel and mips64el should now be removed from unstable, experimental, and related debug and buildd suites. Ansgar
