guenter geiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Then, this would need to be someone who has a bit of insight into > > > linux security modules, in order to explain him why he should change it, > > > and to make sure that it actually doesn't harm security. > > Yes, I have quoted that same link some messages ago, note that the > proposal includes a patch that compiles LSM but it doesn't compile it > as a module (which is what we need). > > Anyhow, I am going to file an ITP of the realtime LSM, as it seems that > this is the preferred method of aquiring realtime privileges, then we try > to solve the rest.
OK. Please try to copy this list on your messages if you can. I don't follow debian-devel. I got little response to my linux-security-modules posting. No complaints and one helpful hint, so it wasn't a waste of time. If Herbert Xu prefers to package and build it as a kernel patch instead, it could easily be done that way. -- joq
