On Monday 12 June 2006 08:50, Mike O'Connor was like: > On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 13:29 +0200, Free Ekanayaka wrote: > > |--==> Free Ekanayaka writes: > > > > FE> Hi Mike, > > FE> I'm starting to work on the rosegarden source package you > > have FE> injected in the demudi Alioth SVN repository. It builds > > fine, but FE> there are still some little things to tweak, which I'm > > going to commit FE> soon. > > > > FE> I nobody else wants to step in, I'd be glad to sponsor the upload > > of FE> this package. > > > > I've just built an i386 version of the new package. You can find it at: > > > > deb http://archive.64studio.com custom main > > deb-src http://archive.64studio.com custom main > > > > it's compiled against sid, so you will need some packages from sid > > (most noticeably kdelibs). > > > > Please if you can give it a test, if everything is ok I'd upload it to > > the Debian archive. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Free > > I spent some time today testing dist-upgrades from sarge in a chroot > with rosegarden4 and rosegarden2 installed, and made some changes which > made the upgrade paths work. > > Otherwise I think its in good shape. > > stew
What approach are you taking with Rosegarden2? Currently Rosegarden is a dummy package which points to Rosegarden2, but should now point to Rosegarden4. There was some talk on debian-qa of turning Rosegarden2 into a dummy package pointing to Rosegarden4 also, which would force an upgrade. I don't think this is a particularly good idea. I would like to know what you two are intending, as I do not wish to raise counter-productive arguments on debian-qa. I think it is important to be clear about this and advise debian-qa appropriately. -- cheers, tim hall http://glastonburymusic.org.uk/tim -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
