> JU> Can you wait until etch release please ? This will mean binaries
> JU> compiled on sid will have a different SONAME requirements, so will no
> JU> longer work on etch. Right ?
>
> No they will still work, as the SONAME is unchanged with respect to
> the jack version in etch, it's still 0.0.23.
Hmm?
$ objdump -p /usr/lib/libjack.so |grep SON
SONAME libjack-0.100.0.so.0
> Why that? The libjack-dev package is currently a virtual package
> (which at the moment is only provided by libjack0.100.0-dev) , and in
> any case a package should better depend on it rather that on
> libjack0.100.0-dev, unless there are specific reasons to do it.
>
> So I think that bug report should be done in any case, to prevent
> having to change build-dependencies if libjack0.100.0-dev gets
> updated, say to libjack0.102.20-dev.
When the -dev name is going to be bumped, we'll have to have a
coordinated transition; with potentially manual testing. It doesn't
have to happen now. We're going to have to do that anyway when
something changes in jack side.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp} Debian Project
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
