Hi, On 19.11.2014 13:09, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Possibly we can simplify even further:* Have package libavcodec-extra-NN provide virtual libavcodec-extra (i.e. non-versioned name of itself) * Let GPLv2 packages conflict against libavcodec-extra (i.e. not replace but complement existing suggests/recommends/depends). How does that sound?
This sounds good, except that the virtual package needs another name, because libavcodec-extra is actually a real package [1].
What do you think about libavcodec-gpl3? Best regards, Andreas 1: https://packages.debian.org/unstable/libavcodec-extra -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
