Control: tags -1 + patch

The following debian/patches/1020-ffmpeg-7.patch seem to fix the build:

Description: More fixes for ffmpeg 7.0
 Use class method GetChannels() as a wrapper to get the ffmpeg version
 dependent implementation instead of the channels method which
 disappeared with ffmpeg 7.
Author: Petter Reinholdtsen
Forwarded: no
Last-Updated: 2024-08-12
---
Index: simplescreenrecorder-salsa/src/AV/Output/AudioEncoder.cpp
===================================================================
--- simplescreenrecorder-salsa.orig/src/AV/Output/AudioEncoder.cpp      
2024-08-12 06:33:54.881267389 +0000
+++ simplescreenrecorder-salsa/src/AV/Output/AudioEncoder.cpp   2024-08-12 
06:35:49.514541002 +0000
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
        if(GetCodecContext()->frame_size <= 1) {
                // This is really weird, the old API uses the size of the 
*output* buffer to determine the number of
                // input samples if the number of input samples (i.e. 
frame_size) is not fixed (i.e. frame_size <= 1).
-               m_temp_buffer.resize(DEFAULT_FRAME_SAMPLES * 
GetCodecContext()->channels * 
av_get_bits_per_sample(GetCodecContext()->codec_id) / 8);
+               m_temp_buffer.resize(DEFAULT_FRAME_SAMPLES * GetChannels() * 
av_get_bits_per_sample(GetCodecContext()->codec_id) / 8);
        } else {
                m_temp_buffer.resize(std::max(FF_MIN_BUFFER_SIZE, 256 * 1024));
        }
@@ -166,7 +166,11 @@
                assert((unsigned int) frame->GetFrame()->nb_samples == 
GetFrameSize());
 #endif
 #if SSR_USE_AVFRAME_CHANNELS
-               assert(frame->GetFrame()->channels == 
GetCodecContext()->channels);
+#  if LIBAVCODEC_VERSION_MAJOR < 61
+               assert(frame->GetFrame()->channels == GetChannels());
+#  else
+               assert(frame->GetFrame()->ch_layout.nb_channels == 
GetChannels());
+#  endif /* LIBAVCODEC_VERSION_MAJOR < 61 */
 #endif
 #if SSR_USE_AVFRAME_SAMPLE_RATE
                assert(frame->GetFrame()->sample_rate == 
GetCodecContext()->sample_rate);

-- 
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen

Reply via email to