Your message dated Fri, 15 Aug 2025 21:07:07 +0000 with message-id <YoVCsfL8XEJWBC6RUwdSOc0Qqikl39zs-y7N324Q1o3pVFNs-puV--wfKNewsX8zrYaQsr4p5-zqBLmsk466iBV2oUqck8EP61ZC-prbg_E=@proton.me> and subject line (No Subject) has caused the Debian Bug report #1001204, regarding librtmp1 depends on libhogweed6 and libnettle8 but attempts to load libhogweed.so.4 and libnettle.so.6 to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) -- 1001204: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1001204 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: librtmp1 Version: 2.4 When I attempt to use `librtmp.so.1` from an ordinary shell prompt (e.g. by invoking `cmake`) it fails with a dynamic linking error: $ cmake cmake: error while loading shared libraries: libhogweed.so.4: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Further investigation reveals that the binary expects missing libraries "libhogweed.so.4" and "libnettle.so.6": $ ldd -v /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/librtmp.so.1 linux-vdso.so.1 (0xbee41000) /usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libarmmem-${PLATFORM}.so => /usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libarmmem-v7l.so (0xb6f60000) libgnutls.so.30 => /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libgnutls.so.30 (0xb6d76000) libhogweed.so.4 => not found libnettle.so.6 => not found libgmp.so.10 => /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libgmp.so.10 (0xb6cff000) libz.so.1 => /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libz.so.1 (0xb6cd7000) libc.so.6 => /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libc.so.6 (0xb6b83000) /lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3 (0xb6f9e000) libp11-kit.so.0 => /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libp11-kit.so.0 (0xb6a76000) libidn2.so.0 => /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libidn2.so.0 (0xb6a47000) libunistring.so.2 => /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libunistring.so.2 (0xb68ca000) libtasn1.so.6 => /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libtasn1.so.6 (0xb68a9000) libnettle.so.8 => /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libnettle.so.8 (0xb6854000) libhogweed.so.6 => /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libhogweed.so.6 (0xb6806000) libpthread.so.0 => /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libpthread.so.0 (0xb67da000) libffi.so.7 => /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libffi.so.7 (0xb67c2000) libdl.so.2 => /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libdl.so.2 (0xb67ae000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libgcc_s.so.1 (0xb6781000) According to `dpkg`, the `librtmp1` package depends on "libhogweed6" and "libnettle8", which supply these libraries in more modern versions 6 and 8, respectively. According to `ldd` outputs the package seems to depend on two versions of the same library. This leads me to suspect a build configuration issue. I suggest that a new version of the library is supplied that eliminates these duplicate dependencies, or a new dependency requirement is introduced for the package so that appropriate libraries are correctly resolved at installation time. I am using Raspbian GNU/Linux 11, kernel 5.10.63-v7l+ and libc6 2.31-13.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Version: 2.4+20151223.gitfa8646d.1-2+b5 At least this version seems correct.
--- End Message ---
