merge 1139462 1139494 thanks Hi Santiago,
On 6/13/26 23:39, Santiago Vila wrote:
Sorry for the duplicates. Based on the title and the fact that the package builds ok again, this one is almost surely the same as #1139468, #1139462, #1139467 and #1139482, so I'm doing the reassign + close.
Thanks for reassign + close. Some dependency problems were blocking the investigation of this issue for me.
(I'm skipping the merge because it becomes messy at times, but feel free to do it yourself).
Sure. I will give it a shot. Best, Andrius

