Hi, On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 12:29:43PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > I am not mad but I am somewhat intrigued. > > Blame it on real life interfering on my Debian work :(
No problem. Good to hear. I had a feel about you reading ML. > > comment on mailing list. I sent a personal e-mail wondering his > > health... No reply. > > Uups... sorry about that :( They're sitting on the inbox, because I didn't > want to reply to them with a "sorry, you will need another AM", and that was > the only answer I could give you, so far. Oh, you could have said "sorry I am busy, but I want to do this please wait". I will be happy editing my package while waiting. > > I think even if there is some reason to delay, NM must be informed about > > situation at least once a month from AM. Is he still alive? He told me > > on ML that he will do something after debconf. > > Actually, I contacted the helpdesk in IRC and told them I would probably > have to drop my NMs because I simply was not finding the time to handle > them. This happened two weeks ago, I think. Helpdesk is short on AMs, > though, and even more on AMs that would like to somehow make doc NMs happen > in a more smooth way. So I was asked to not send you guys a "sorry, can't > do it right now" letter yet, and try to find a way to free up time to AM you > :( Understood. No reply was bud choice, though. We all know we have life outside of Debian and volunteer organization can be stretched thin. > Since then, I RFA'ed fetchmail to free up some debian time, but it was not > enough. I was trying to free up some time next week, but I can't really > promise that either. > > > I hope he is just busy with life. > So far, that's the only problem: got promoted at work, and that ate up 80% > of the work time I could use for Debian (albeit in a restricted way), and > did some very bad things to my spare time otherwise (so I have not managed > to redirect some of that time to Debian yet). Good for you. > I wonder if I could get you guys going on tasks & skills (which is the > troublesome part of a doc maintainer test), and some other AM handle the > other stuff. That would speed up matters a lot. I see. I can certainly be sure I am not up for any core binary packages. But I had my name in maintainer field of "printtool" package at one time in woody testing cycle (mostly TCL and shell). Yes this was mistake in official maintainer. So I am open for packaging some utility packages and would like to be tested for that "tasks & skills". Anyway, as you said before this doc maintainer test is new and takes time to get ready. Just drop us a message once a month telling us you are working on it :) I will wait. > Reply-to set to newmaint list, let's move the thread there. Subscribed to newmaint list :) Reply to it. -- +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> @ Cupertino, CA USA +
