> is it because it would take more skill to make a package without > debhelper?
probably yes, but really - why? Debhelper was created because of (quite) hard work needed to create a package without it, and it helps very much with maintaining and creating packages - I also think it's a standard now, and we *should* use it, because of more integrity of various packages, am I wrong? Maybe some of more skilled developers will explain us, why that check of maintainer's skills is widely used till today? Best regards, -- Mati ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and not yet ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Sounds like a Windows problem, try calling Microsoft support
