On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 12:32:49PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote: > Hi, Joe Wreschnig wrote: > > > So, it might take people 3 years, but YMMV. > > The problem is that the last step doesn't have an odometer, nor a gas > gauge, thus you don't know your mileage until you arrive. > > Anyway, [1] states that the DAM does have a backup (joey). Apparently, > both haven't been able to do any NM processing for the past six weeks.
db.debian.org (samosa) is down at the moment, presumably no one can create accounts. > Might it be possible to replace the single-point-of-failure DAM with a > Peer Review system? I.e., some DDs (the existing AMs?) are tasked with > checking the AM reports; three(?) YES votes approves the new maintainer, > one NO vote (with justification please...) relegates them to the DAM. Perhaps we need a more well-defined action to take here rather than relegation to the DAM. > If people think this is a good idea, I am willing, and actually have the > time, to extend the NM pages to implement this. Lots of us think something along the lines is a good idea. Refusal of the parties who actually need to be involved in these changes (front desk and DAM) to engage in the discussion puts a bit of a damper on things. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
