Matthias Urlichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > While that message sure would be interesting (it surely should be archived > in d-announce ..?), I don't think that legalizing about its content is > going to be helpful one way or another.
No, I'm just curious to know what DAM's remit is and it should be more definitive than the nm site description. For reasons I didn't realise, it seems it doesn't exist. All good data. -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know. Thought: Edwin A Abbott wrote about trouble with Windows in 1884
