* Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040221 13:55]: > Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > * Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-20 13:28]:
> > > ultimate rejection: > > > > > > The DAM has to be replaced, which is very unlikely. > > > > No, there can be a GR about accepting the applicant against the DAM's > > wish (you don't have to replace the DAM, just override him in that > > case). > But an ultimate rejection is not becoming a DD on his watch. So, if > the DAM is overruled by a GR, consequently he would have to respond in > giving up his job. Thats the thread hanging there or not? No. The sucessful GR would mean that the DAM-vote is overriden. If - and only if - the DAM would ignore this decision (and violate by this the constitution), then there'd be a need for this. > There also doesn't seem to be a timeline for reapplying after an > ultimate rejection. Ultimate rejection sounds like a life sentence. Yes. > Or can one reapply once the DAM changed? Or call a GR to be allowed to > reapply? No, unless this decision is taken back. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
