Duncan Findlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I agree that it is fine to ask questions that might require the > applicants to look something up; however, I'd prefer that the > knowledge gained from this is useful. The intricacies of the runtime > linker (or "fundamental runtime linker knowledge", as the question > writer calls it) are not particularly useful, IMHO.
Question W was added after we had a problem with the "fundamental" knowledge. Again. And again. And... BTW: If NMs really read the mails with the templates sent to them they would have a pointer for nearly everything they need to answer the mails. (The P&P Template). -- bye Joerg * libpng2 no libpng3 no why ? because no yes no yes no yes bullshit no yes no yes no yes stop ? no when someday beep beep beep beep (Closes: #157011) -- Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thu, 29 Aug 2002 16:41:58 +0200

