Hi Marc, * Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-08-13 14:37]: > Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > * Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-08-13 11:10]: > > > On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 10:53:54PM -0500, srinivas aki wrote: > > [...] > > You are right, an I don't want to be impatient but why for > > example people[1] get an AM before me[2] if I got my > > advocate check earlier? > > Please direct questions about your application at the Front Desk > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) in the future, we're not always able to follow > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sending mail directly to us ensures an answer.
Ok sorry. > The Front Desk tries to assign AMs to "fitting" applicants, that means > that the order of the queue is not strictly binding. In theory, this > shouldn't make a big difference, but the current shortage of AMs makes > the impact of this worse than it should be. Please wait another week or > two, you should get an AM soon. Ok, thanks for your statement! Regards Nico -- Nico Golde - JAB: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: 0x73647CFF http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org VIM has two modes - the one in which it beeps and the one in which it doesn't -- encrypted mail preferred
pgphglTJNaEMr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
