Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>It's not a FIFO queue, it's up to the DAM to decide in what order he >>processes the applicants. > And is this reasonable? :-P I would say "no". What good reason > could the DAM have for processing applicants in a non-FIFO order, apart from > rare special cases? Well, maybe some get done by each of the two DAMs; that > would make sense. Anyay, Phlipp Kern wrote that he was told that DAM > processing was FIFO, so maybe this isn't even true. > > The DAMs -- all *two* of them -- are very very busy people. > Is it sane to force everyone through a tight bottleneck of careful review and > approval by one of two very very very busy people, after the comprehensive AM > report is done? Isn't there some better way to review the AM report? > Doesn't the Front Desk *already* review the AM report, and much more > efficiently, too?
The FD -- all *two* of us -- probably aren't all that much better. As for myself, I'm next to useless when it comes to reviewing reports--I'm sure Marc will verify that. I posted some ideas a few days ago about how to speed this stuff up, but no one replied: http://lists.debian.org/debian-newmaint/2005/11/msg00019.html -- Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
