Damyan Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 1. George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> applied for NM on 10th of > September 2005 > 2. I've applied for NM on 10th of September 2005. > 3. While waiting for AM assignment I was right *after* George in the > queue. > 3. isaac is assigned for my AM on 04th of April 2006 > 4. [EMAIL PROTECTED] is still in the unassigned queue. > > So I am curious, how is the unassigned queue processed?
More or less in order, with some exceptions: People without a notable contribution don't get an AM, but are informed per mail and I try to match up AMs with the first few applicants in the queue of unassigned people. It's normally better if KDE-related people get AMs who have at least a bit of KDE packaging experience, for example. Also, I try to assign clearly "easy" cases to new AMs, which means applicants who are active, have a signed gpg key and are not known for flamewars. > Right now there are people who applied months before me and still have > no AM assigned. These people are those that haven't contributed yet, plus Kai Hendry, who's waiting for a new AM after his last one had no time anymore. Marc -- BOFH #273: The cord jumped over and hit the power switch.
pgpxRUcY05ZaR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
