On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 11:06:13PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > I have not directly worked Debian-wise with William, but know him from > the Free Software activities in my country - and have talked with him > several times. I have reviewed his currently sponsored work in Debian, > and is very well kept, which speaks well about his personal abilities
Just one clarification: you say "I have not directly worked Debian-wise with William", and that phrase raises a FD alarm bell about this size: http://www.1-800-4clocks.com/images/Big-Ben-Clock-Bell-London.jpg However you say that you have reviewed his sponsored work in Debian. The two statements are, as I see it, contradictory, unless it was just a quick review. Also considering how it went 6 months ago, I would feel more comfortable if I saw another advocacy message from one of the people who actually sponsor his uploads. I see many people are sponsoring his packages, so it should not be a big problem: $ who-uploads shtool Uploads for shtool: 2.0.8-4 to unstable: Jan Hauke Rahm <[email protected]> 2.0.8-3 to unstable: Daniel Baumann <[email protected]> 2.0.8-2 to unstable: Daniel Baumann <[email protected]> $ who-uploads hwinfo Uploads for hwinfo: 16.0-2 to unstable: Barry deFreese <[email protected]> 16.0-1 to unstable: Alexander Schmehl <[email protected]> 15.3-2 to unstable: Alexander Schmehl <[email protected]> $ who-uploads scrot Uploads for scrot: 0.8-11 to unstable: George Danchev <[email protected]> 0.8-10 to unstable: Patrick Matthäi (Debian) <[email protected]> 0.8-9 to unstable: <unrecognised public key (73CDA455)> I am not in fact Cc-ing them now because there are too many and I don't want to end up spamming people :) But if you could please ask whoever of them you think is more appropriate to chime in, I'd really appreciate it. Feel free to quote this message to them if you think it would help. Ciao, Enrico -- GPG key: 4096R/E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini <[email protected]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
