On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 01:29:36PM +0100, Claudio Sacerdoti Coen wrote: > On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 12:27:37 +0100, Sven LUTHER wrote: > > As promised, i have just uploaded the lablgl (0.94) and lablgtk > > (1.00.2000.08.29, this is 20000829, but my experience in package version is > > that if you want a future 1.01 fro mthe author to upgrade correctly, you > > should give the package a long version number like above) to master incoming. > > But the last version is 20001129, isn't it? Ok, updated it, ... The latest release is available from the same sources as before. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: LablGtk packages plan... Sven LUTHER
- Re: LablGtk packages plan... Claudio Sacerdoti Coen
- Re: LablGtk packages plan... Sven LUTHER
- Re: LablGtk packages plan... Claudio Sacerdoti Coen
- Re: LablGtk packages plan... Sven LUTHER
- Re: LablGtk packages plan... David Mentre
- Re: LablGtk packages plan... Sven LUTHER
- LablGL and LablGtk packages are in master incoming. Sven LUTHER
- Re: LablGL and LablGtk packages are in master ... Claudio Sacerdoti Coen
- Re: LablGL and LablGtk packages are in mas... Sven LUTHER
- Re: LablGL and LablGtk packages are in mas... Sven LUTHER
- Re: LablGL and LablGtk packages are in... Claudio Sacerdoti Coen
- Re: LablGL and LablGtk packages ar... Sven LUTHER
- Re: LablGL and LablGtk packag... Claudio Sacerdoti Coen
- Re: LablGL and LablGtk pa... Sven LUTHER
- Re: LablGL and LablGtk pa... Claudio Sacerdoti Coen

