On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 01:02:38PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 11:10:11AM +0100, Sven LUTHER wrote: > > What do you (all) think of it ? > > OK, I now agree with you: > all modules will be installed in the dir /usr/lib/ocaml/<package_dir>. > If module use findlib, that dir will also contain a META file, if the > module does not use findlib, there not exists a META file: we write them > (with the aid of Gerd :))) and send it to the upstream author imploring > him to include it in the upstream version. > > Do you agree ? Ok, for now, i still would have liked more a separate directory for meta-files, but then, let's do with what we have. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: debian packaging of findlib Gerd Stolpmann
- Re: debian packaging of findlib Sven LUTHER
- Re: debian packaging of findlib Stefano Zacchiroli
- Re: debian packaging of findlib Remi VANICAT
- Re: debian packaging of findlib Sven LUTHER
- Re: debian packaging of findlib Gerd Stolpmann
- Re: debian packaging of findlib Sven LUTHER
- Re: debian packaging of findlib Stefano Zacchiroli
- Re: debian packaging of findlib Sven LUTHER
- Re: debian packaging of findlib Stefano Zacchiroli
- Re: debian packaging of findlib Sven LUTHER
- Re: debian packaging of findlib Stefano Zacchiroli
- Re: debian packaging of findlib Gerd Stolpmann
- Re: debian packaging of findlib Gerd Stolpmann
- Re: debian packaging of findlib Sven LUTHER
- Re: debian packaging of findlib Stefano Zacchiroli
- Re: debian packaging of findlib Gerd Stolpmann
- Re: debian packaging of findlib Sven LUTHER
- Re: debian packaging of findlib Stefano Zacchiroli

