Sven LUTHER wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 10:23:17AM +0200, Georges Mariano wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Is this really necessary ?? I mean why not >= 3.00 ??
>
> Because the .cmo are incompatible between 3.01 and 3.00, and will most
> probably be incompatible with 3.02 or so, that said, it is no problem for all
> stuff that are no libraries.
Oh, yes !... OK I'll upgrade all my linux boxes to 3.01 ;-)
> Now, we could have a parrallel installation of both 3.01 and 3.00, or
> somethign such, putting each 3.01 stuff into /usr/lib/ocaml/3.01, but is it
> worth it ?
Not for me, but for Xavier Leroy ??? :-)
PS : does that mean that we can consider 3.00 as "dead"...
thanks
--
# Georges MARIANO tel: (33) 03 20 43 84 06
# INRETS, 20 rue �lis�e Reclus fax: (33) 03 20 43 83 59
# 59650 Villeneuve d'Ascq mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
# FRANCE.
# http://www3.inrets.fr/estas/mariano
# http://www3.inrets.fr/B-Bibliography
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
