On Fri, 9 Nov 2001 14:23:39 +0100 Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>SZ > following Ralf experience, I think that the better we can do are >SZ > "camlidl" and "camlidl-doc", both packages are decente sized (100K and >SZ > 200K). just a detail, what do you call "camlidl-doc" ? is it a) the upstream available html files ? b) or the freshly generated ones (from inside the packaging process) ?? i.e one source package but splitted into two binaries camlidl and camlidl-doc ... I would prefer the b) but note that the Makefile uses tools like htmlgen, htmlcut, htmlthread, format-intf, texquote3 ... Maybe we can propose upstream to switch to latex/hevea generated documentation :-) cheers -- # mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] tel: (33) 03 20 43 84 06 # INRETS, 20 rue �lis�e Reclus fax: (33) 03 20 43 83 59 # BP 317 -- 59666 Villeneuve d'Ascq # http://www3.inrets.fr/estas/mariano -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
