On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 04:03:31PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 05:01:44PM +0100, Sven wrote: > > I would have packaged it also, and if you don't do it, i will. > > no probs and, more important, no need to double packaging efforts. > I will resign from the ITP before doing it! :)
Mmm, if you like, i will go for camlimage, i plan to use it in a project nextly, as said, so maybe it will be better, don't know, i hope to have the time, ... > > We also need someone to look at the mmm program, it would be nice to have it > > working again. i repackaged ocamltk for it, but failed to find the time to > > What you mean with "to look at": as developer or as packager? > > If you mean as packager I think that is not the case do debianize it, > seems to me that MMM is a "resigned" project ... I don't know who is > developing it but some times ago I had a look at it and the web page was > stopped from 1998 ... > IIRC MMM supports only HTML 3.2, nothing more :-( No, you are wrong, Pierre Weis and Jun did the effort to port it to the latest ocam lversions, and announced it on the ocaml list. I wanted to package it after that (especially as some japanese users seemed to like it), but failed due to a problem during the build. I did not manage to find the reason quickly, nor did Jun, but i didn't try much, and it works on other systems, so there should be no reason it don't works, and if there is, it most probably is a bug elsewhere in the debian packages. Also it is an investigation problem, i am sure Jun will be willing to look at it once we isolate the problem and he can reproduce it. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
