On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 10:54:22AM -0800, Randolph Chung wrote: > > Ok, ... > > > > when is the deadline for potato inclusion ? > > I hope you mean woody :) base/task freeze is end of this week.
yes, woody, ... So if i submit a ocaml task tommorrow, it would still be in time. But, does it make sense ? Will you include it, it will be mostly as i described before, with some nicer description and mostly the same packages. Or do i have to propose it in its final form before you consider it ? > > Why not have more tasks, but classify them by levels of easiness or something > > such ? > > tasksel doesn't have this concept. maybe in woody+1 ... together with the subtasks, ... > > mmm, i thought these were obsolet, but i guess it is just that the task- was > > dropped from the metapackage name. > > we've had metapackages for a long time. netscape for example... > metapackages are not handled by tasksel. Yes, i know ... is there a new naming scheme for those now that you have dropped the task- from them ? That's what confused the issue for me, that and the total lack of any information about it in the developper corner. > > In this case, it would be better to have 2 or more metapackages, or one alone > > ? > > your call. Ok, but these meta package are not concerned with this week end freeze, are they ? Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
