On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 01:15:29PM +0100, georges mariano wrote: > On Mon, 17 Dec 2001 13:20:26 +0100 > Sven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This would assuredly make the individual packages smaller (camlp4 is > 1.2 MB, > > while ocaml is 5.4 MB or so). > > > > But then we could just keep one big fat package. > > My I suggest to keep a few but (may be fat) packages to avoid > multiplying problems (and [trivial?] bug reports mainly related to > bad/insufficient dependencies) until woody release, > and thus to postpone this discussion (and the policy one) to a more > comfortable period (when there will be no deadline)
Ok, this is a reasonable suggestion ... There should not be any major dependency problems, i think. > As a user (and for now), I would prefer a small set of well-known > and well-defined packages rather than a more sophisticated > ocaml-debian > distrib with annoying "bugs" (even they probably will be trivial) But then, you don't use a slow modem connection to upgrade your box. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
