Sven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > No, i do no such thing, since ocaml has as source package the plain unmodified > upstream tarball (ocaml-3.04.tar.gz), while i did a small source package for > the documentation, regrouping all the different documentation files available > separatedly (dvi, txt, ps, pdf, info and man).
How was the documentation managed in the previous versions of the package? There was no documentation in the main tarball? > It would have been easier if we had the upstream latex source, but they don't > want to release it. Why don't they want to release the html source? -- J�r�me Marant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
