On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 01:03:33PM -0500, Maxence Guesdon wrote: > About compiling efuns, i know that it needs the cdk.
Well, the cdk is just a bunch of ocaml stuff put together with some patches applied for the confort of those that have to depend on systems without proper packaging support. But i suppose it would be possible to identify more exactly what kind of stuff is needed to compile efuns, i think to remember one of the things that was needed was the exportation of one of the files from the ocaml source. I am ready to provide it in the ocaml package, or even in an ocaml_for_efuns package or something such, but i need to know what file exactly is needed. > About people using efuns, i think if it was simple to install there would be more >people using it. Sure, and a debian package would be a big step in the right direction ... > If you use emacs just for file edition, then efuns is enough, and it can be >parametrized in ocaml ! > But it lacks a good doc :-( As many packages ... > Fabrice (Le fessant ,the author) doesn't have the time for this right now. While >discussing with him, we agreed that at least a binary distribution would be good. I'm >quite busy too these days but may be in february i could compile and make a binary >distrib (for intel, statically linked). Mmm, a binary distribution is the same as not having anything, at least were debian is concerned, but then, isn't fabrice one of the guys behind the cdk ? I remember being fully ignored by those guys when i mailed them the first time they spoke of the cdk. I guess they thiunk there is notyhing in common between the debian packaging effort and the cdk effort, which have a different goal anyway. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
