Scripsit Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> So I can't rewrite the point in such a way it impose that commercial
> distributions are themselves "free", in the sense of "free software",
> right again?

Correct.

> Please, tell me why we (as debian) have to care about "aggregation".

Because we want to make sure that users of Debian have the freedom to
reproduce copies of the software, at least if they jumpo through the
easy hoop of aggregating it with something.

> Why we can't leave it as it is and leave O'Reilly care about this if

Because we're concerned with the user's right.

-- 
Henning Makholm          "NB! Benbrud er et symptom, ikke en sygdom. Hvis du
                   har br�kket benet b�r du g� til l�gen for at f� fastsl�et
       �rsagen. Brug aldrig Herbalit<tm> mod benbrud uden l�gens anvisning."


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to