On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 01:07:02PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 09:50:03AM +0100, Sven wrote: > > I don't know about IoXML, but such stuff would be best integrated in the > > ocaml-tools package, or more probably, in a ocaml-contrib-libraries or > > something such package. Feel free to create such a package, even if it > > contains only IoXML for now, as we may like to add stuff there later on. > > Ok for me, if Ralf wants to add IoXML to ocaml-tools. > Anyway IoXML is not really a library but is a syntax extension written > in camlp4, so probably we can add a package with some of them when we > get additional interesting extensions.
Today, Judica�l Courant gave me an introduction into camlp4. I absolutely agree that it would be useful to package IoXML. There is, however, a reson not to include it into ocaml-tools: An IoXML package would include native versions of a library, hence the package would be architecture dependent. The ocaml-tools package, on he other hand, is architecture independent (and I would like to keep it this way). -Ralf. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
