On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 10:28:13AM +0100, Georges Mariano wrote: > > > > > - libxxx-ocaml will provide the shared library > > > > stubs, and all other stuff needed to run a dynamic > > > > loading ocaml bytecode executable that > > > > > > yuk, I like this naming schema :-) > > > > :)) > > :((
BTW, what about things like camlimage or camlzip or other such ? should they become : libcamlzip-ocaml or libzip-ocaml ? The first one is more straightforward, but redoundant. And Georges, if you don't like this scheme, what do you propose ? Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
