On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 09:34:15AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: > > But, i will make a proposal for the DFSG to be ammended so as to remove the > > aggregation clause, or at least clearly state that we consider a null or > > almost null aggregation ok. > > It would have to be the other way around; to state that even trivial > aggregations MUST be allowed by the license. Nitpicking a license, only > to leave ourselves unable to distribute part of our own 'approved' > archive, is no win. :) > > But I definitely agree with you that some action needs to be taken on > the documentation-as-software question.
Thanks for your comment, after having reread it i understand that now. The best wording would somewhat of the kind : can be distributed ... either as an aggregation or standalone ... Or something such. This does not solve the documentation (and printed books) as software problem though. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
