On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 06:10:46PM +0100, Remi VANICAT wrote: > Sven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Ok, lets go with your solution then ... > > > > BTW, but it would make more sense to name the package ocaml-dev-lib or > > something such also, ... well, maybe ocaml-dev-kit, or somthing > > such, or maybe even ocaml-cdk :))) > > nope, there is still things that are in the cdk and not in debian. By > the way I've look for an non cdk distribution of the cdk Extra Library > and found none, and it seem a pain to make one. I don't have the time > now.
Altough it would be confusing, i don't think they have the monopoly on the name caml development kit, especially since it is not an official thing. That said, ocaml-dev-kit would be fine. Finally, i think we will never be able to match the cdk fully, because, if i am right, they patch the ocaml package, which is a thing i don't wish to do to heavily. (And Xavier discouraged me to do so anyway.) Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
