On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 02:55:02AM +0100, Remi VANICAT wrote: > Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Hi Sven, > > the META file distributed with lablgtk 1.2.3 is not up to date, the > > current one report these two lines: > > > > archive(byte)="lablgtk.cma gtkInit.cmo" > > archive(native)="lablgtk.cmxa gtkInit.cmx" > > > > The correct ones are instead: > > > > archive(byte)="lablgtk.cma lablgnome.cma lablgtkgl.cma lablglade.cma >gtkInit.cmo" > > archive(native)="lablgtk.cmxa lablgnome.cmxa lablgtkgl.cmxa lablglade.cmxa >gtkInit.cmx" > > > > certainly not. lablgnome, lablgtkgl lablglade and gtkInit are not > necessary for lablgtk to work. > > One might want lablgtk without the rest of the lib. (and most surely > whiteout gtkInit, as one may want to make an ocaml that can choose > (someway) to have or not a gtk interface, other might be less > important to avoid, as the ocaml linker may not link them if they are > not used).
Just note that lablgtk (the toplevel) will be linked by all four. DO you propose that we have 4different lablgtk toplevels ? (Also Jacques (the upstream author) is not favorable to removing the gnome and glade part out of lablgtk and in a new package). Anyway, this is a post woody issue, i think. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
