Sven Luther wrote:
Hello all, ...
Hello,
That said, there is an alternative, which we can use if the situation continues like that for a long duration, and that would be to ask for the removal of Stefano's libpgsql (or whatever, i never remember the name of this one) package from testing. If we were to do this, and the package would be removed in timely fashion, then all ocaml stuff would enter testing the next day, and the libpgsql library will enter testing the day after postgresql becomes a valid candidate. This course of action would cause problem if : o Stefano thinks it is a bad idea :))) o Someone following testing is really using libpgsql on an arch where postgresql is not built (sparc i think). The case where he does on i386 could simply be solved by installing the unstable version of postgresql and libpgsql. So, what do you think about this plans ? Do we wait (a few more days) or do we ask for the removal of libpgsql from testing ? I think it is stefano who has to take the decision about this, based on what he sees best for the libpgsql users.
I second this proposal. I was about to propose it today.
The idea would be to temporarily remove ocaml-pgsql from unstable, then
wait for ocaml to enter testing and finally reupload ocaml-pgsql in unstable.
I don't know whether it is possible to do it without completely remove the
package from both testing and unstable. So, better ask ftpmasters.
If you have access to IRC, ask neuro, elmo or aj: it is always faster to
contact them directly.
Cheers,
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
