Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 08:53:22AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: >> > IMO we should fallback on >=/<< dependencies for build-dependencies and >> > keep on using virtual names for dependencies. >> But what about using only the >= dependencies and dropping the << ones ? > > [ I'm assuming that your question is related to build-dependencies ] > > Uhm ... well yes, we can drop the << and avoid some auto builders delay, > but we still have to reupload a new package each time we like it to be > rebuilt against a new library bumping the >= dependency ... > > IMO we can go for it, Jerome?, someone else?
I second this. Cheers, -- J�r�me Marant http://marant.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
