On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 07:23:30PM +0200, J�r�me Marant wrote: > Quoting Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > Damn, they don't seem to have any license :-( What's the best, knowing > > that > > > > it > > > > must include parts of the OCaml compiler and some parts of cameleon ? > > > > > > It could be LGPL, which can be mixed with QPL. > > > > Better make it the ocaml runtime LGPL version. > > I did not understand what you meant. I was proposing to license > epeire and topcameleon LGPL.
The idea is to use the same LGPL + exception (for static linking and such) that the ocaml runtime uses. Friendly, Sven Luther > > -- > J�r�me Marant > > > -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
