On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 08:40:47AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 08:03:42AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Well, since i have sleep i have some more arguments pro central repo for > > ocaml : > > - maintaining package is more a "transverse" work, ie : when you package > > ocaml related work, you still do the same thing ( need to check this > > and this and this ) with some variant. So when you change the need for > > things A to things B ( ocaml-3.07 to ocaml-3.08 ) you could do it in > > one pass if you have a central repo, or you need to wait for a > > propagation of information if not. To my mind it is really useful to > > have a set of package which need the same knowledge in the same place. > > Are you proposing a batched auto-upgrade of ocaml version for libraries > setup ? This would need a bit of doing, but would indeed be a really > nice thing to have. > > Friendly, > > Sven Luther >
Hello, Well, i am not formally proposing it, it is just an idea... But i agree on the fact, it is not a good idea to make it depend on svn... Well, by the way, maybe this thread rely on a thing i don't have explain : i am not against arch or svn, or whatever, i only stat that it is a good thing to have a common place to do the work. Well of course, debian tools / architecture by itself should be sufficient, but i was thinking of something more easy to do without needing to upload things ( ie not NMU ). It is only a personnal case : i am not a DD and i cannot upload, so every package i build / correct / break ( yeah i also break things ) need to have a sponsor etc... With a common place, which i can have access it is simpler to work. It is just a statement of my personnal opinion... Maybe when -- if -- i will be a DD, i won't have the same view. Kind regard Sylvain LE GALL -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
