Sylvain, On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 10:23:40PM +0100, Sylvain LE GALL wrote: > On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 08:46:01PM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 08:44:10PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > I think we can also move packages/ocaml-tools to projects/ocaml-tools, > > > since there is no real upstream apart from us who are injecting things > > > in it... > > > > I don't understand. Of course there is an upstream - in fact there > > are (at the moment) three of them. We just merge them into one > > orig.tar.gz tarball, and build the package from it.
> Well, correct me if i am wrong : all upstream ( the one who put small > files together, not the real up-upstream ) are all debian developper and The only upstream(s) are those who author the files. The people who bundle them are not upstream. > the version of the package is tightly bound to debian ( ie this > collection of file is targeted to debian )... No, the version number is tightly bound to the date. > If this is the case, i think it is more interesting to use projects/ so > we can easily add/remove/manage files. Why? ocaml-tools is a package, not a project. I don't understand what you are aiming at. -Ralf. -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
