Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 09:43:43AM +0200, J�r�me Marant wrote: >> Quoting Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> > ocaml (3.08.0-1) unstable; urgency=low >> > . >> > * New upstream release. >> > * Do not install the emacs files, until upstream gives a response about >> > the >> > licencing issue. (Closes: #227159, #227163) >> ^^^^^^^^^^ >> You shouldn't have listened to those debian-legal morons: we could have >> lived with it as we used to. What about people who were using this >> mode and seeing it suddenly vanish? >> >> I think those people are wrong because: >> >> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#IfInterpreterIsGPL > > Notice that i think the claim was that emacs provided bindings for the ocaml > mode to use, and thus is considered as a linked work, as per paragraph two of > the link you quoted above.
I don't understand how it applies to those emacs files. There is nothing such a JNI-like binding in thsi ocaml mode. Emacs calls the ocaml toplevel and that's all. However, I found discrepencies: some .el files are QPL'ed and the rest of them GPL. -- J�r�me Marant
