On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 08:29:54PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello, > > On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 05:53:40PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 05:40:29PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 05:38:58PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > > > Any reason why not to drop the old cache paych in favor of the new > > > > one? > > > > > > Well, the old patch did something more than the current one, which is > > > still enough for having an advi working with current debian default > > > settings. > > > > > > Could you please keep it just for the records? Maybe sometime in the > > > future I will need to look again at the old patch ... > > > > Ok. > > > > I will then make an upload now, even though the doc stuff installation is > > disabled, and ask Sylvain to have a look at it. > > > > Sylvain, can you have a look at advi ? You did the doc installation stuff i > > think. > > > > Indeed, it was me who makes the doc things... I don't remember > precisely why, but i think it was a bug concerning the need to split the > package between advi and advi-doc ( but i am really not sure ).
It was because the package previously to your intervention was a mess with regard to .dvi files, since it shipped lot of not needed stuff. Could you have a look at advi for this issue again ? All the remaining stuff are ok, and i made the upload, but the doc directory, i don't think we ship anything in it. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
