On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 08:33:53PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 08:58:43AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 08:14:14PM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote: > > > > > > Severity: Serious > > > Justification: FTBFS > > > Package: libcamlimages-ocaml > > > > > > As of version 2.12-2, package libcamlimages-ocaml has not yet been > > > rebuilt with libtiff4. Please rebuild the package with libtiff4 and > > > upload with urgency=medium. Note that taking care of this problem is > > > a prerequisite for ultimately being included in sarge, even if a > > > version of this package already appears in testing. No source changes > > > are required; updating dependencies and rebuilding should be > > > sufficient. All packages not uploaded within several days will be > > > NMUed. Many thanks for your patience and cooperation. > > > > Bullshit, camlimage 2.12-6 is in unstable, and built against libtiff4. Closing > > this bug report because of it. > > > > No it is not really bullshit, i made a post on -devel this morning. > There is still a 2.12-2 package for all arch expect sparc and powerpc. > The rebuild of the package is waiting for a lablgtk/lablgtk2 rebuild on > all arches ( expect sparc and powerpc ).
Well, sure, but bugs are against source packages, so ... If i should fill a bug every time the powerpc (or god help me, the m68k or mips) autobuilder is lagging behind, there would be no end of it. > Kind regard > Sylvain Le Gall > > ps : however, you are right to close the bugs, since the latest version > of the package is not concerned by this FTBFS... Sure. Now, camlimage depends on libdb3, which conflicts with libdb4.2 used by apache and mod-caml :/ Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
