On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 01:27:35PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: > On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 06:36:46PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > > Normally, things will just percolate to testing correctly when new > > > packages are uploaded. There is no particular need to force the > > > autobuilders to rebuild it in general. If any particular arch has built > > > it wrong, that's what a binary-only build is for. Not to mention that > > > things can't enter testing if their deps aren't met. > > > > Well, if you have a better understanding of how the autobuilder infrastructure > > work, then by all way, explain to us what is the right way to make sure things > > work as they should. > > I'm not saying that you lack the understanding, just that, in general, > the autobuilder issue is orthogonal to proper control file lines. If > you write your control file correctly, the autobuilders will do the > right thing in most cases.
Well, it used to break horribly before we adopted this system. > > Again, this is post sarge discussion. > > Well, it started because someone threatened to submit RC bugs against my > package, though I have yet to see an instance where it actually does the > wrong thing in sarge. Yeah. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
