On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 11:23:41AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: > On Friday 10 September 2004 11:21 am, Sven Luther wrote: > > > Argh, this is all so complex and wrong. Why not use Arch and > > > tla-buildpackage? > > > > Because tla is horrendous and uncomprehensible :) > > The docs are better now :-) > > www.gnuarch.org > > > Well, what guarantee do you have that the tarball will always be > > available ? If nothing else it should always go with the tagged > > Why do you need that guarantee?
Because, at least for GPLed stuff, we somehow promised 3 year of source availablity :). > > versions, but then, arch doesn't support proper tagging anyway. > > Actually, it's called configs, but the need for tags/svn cp/whatever is > mostly removed by its design. Not convinced, and i had the arch guys explaining to me for almost half a day when i was going to do the parted arch repo. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
