On Sat, Jan 01, 2005 at 05:25:20PM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote: > On Sat, Jan 01, 2005 at 04:11:18PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 01, 2005 at 02:58:47PM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote: > > > Happy New Year, > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 11:31:36PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > > > On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 04:20:37PM +0000, Richard Jones wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 05:54:11PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > > > > > What about installing tuareg by default in the ocaml-core or > > > > > > whatever > > > > > > meta-package, and have it ask a debconf question at priority medium > > > > > > about > > > > > > which of the two emacs bindings should be used ? > > > > > > > > > > What about ditching the core emacs support and just including tuareg > > > > > mode instead, since (no offence to whoever wrote the core support) > > > > > tuareg's much better. > > > > > > > > The core stuff is part of the ocaml package upstream, while tuareg is > > > > not. I > > > > am no emacs user, but i somehow don't feel well for removing the core > > > > emacs > > > > mode. > > > > > > I think the best way to handle this is using the debian alternatives > > > system (see update-alternatves(8)), plus providing some information > > > how the user can override the alternative choosen by the system > > > administrator. When using alternatives tuareg-mode should have > > > priority over caml-mode. > > > > Yep, this make sense, if you could do this, i will make an upload of the > > ocaml package with the needed changes. The user can simply remove the tuareg > > package for the standard stuff being enabled again. > > OK, I will look into this. -Ralf.
Thanks, Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
