On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 08:17:40AM +0100, Remi Vanicat wrote: > On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 00:56:12 +0100, Samuel Mimram > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Argh! > > > > Having a look at this problem I dicovered that hevea was under the QPL > > which is generally considered as non-free if I remember correctly the > > events of this summer concerning OCaml. Sven, I'm I correct? > > The last version of the QPL is free, it is the licence of KDE (or at > least of the underliying library) and of the OCaml compiler.
One latest than the one i had to flamewar on debian-legal lengthily a few months back ? The problematic clauses where the choice of venue and the QPL 3c if i remember well. > > Should this package be moved to non-free? > > Nop. I agree, but debian-legal may disagree. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
