On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 10:23:17PM +0100, Sylvain LE GALL wrote: > Hello, > On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 10:09:27PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 08:46:41PM +0100, Sylvain LE GALL wrote: > > > If you made a debian repository on alioth, i propose to rebuild ocaml > > > package for arch i386 ( it was a big problem for me last time, because > > > i386 wasn't build in unstable, because of latency with lablgtk ). > > > > Well, this is the same I proposed with the exception I propose using > > experimental instead of an alioth repository. > > > > I think experimental is more suitable since it is more "official" than > > an alioth repository. > > > > Humm, well i don't disagree to your statement. There is only one problem > : do i have the right to upload to experimental ( considering i am not a > DD ) ? > > ( if i can, i agree on the fact that an alioth repo is not mandatory ).
Well, we had the following reply from vorlon : 20:33 < vorlon> aba: I told him last time he asked, that ocaml is self-contained, so as long as he doesn't have anything broken in testing (which he currently does, I think -- I just saw an RC bug on mldonkey), it doesn't matter to me. So, this basically is a green light, provided the RC bug against mldonkey is fixed. Mmm, there are two of them Sylvain, can you comment on this ? Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
