On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 05:55:26PM -0500, Mike Furr wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Sven Luther wrote: > | Anyway, the plan is as follows : > | > | 1) i upload ocaml 3.08.3-1, we wait until all or most autobuilders have > | catched it up. > | > | 2) then we upload all level 1 dependencies (those that depend or build > | depend only on ocaml 3.08.3). We wait for them to be autobuilt. > Cool, looks good. A couple of questions.. > > It looks like ocaml was successfully built on all archs now. Do you > know a good way to tell if they binaries have been installed for use in > the buildd chroots(ie: how long to wait until we start the next level)?
I would wait until tomorrow at least, since hppa was built post-dinstall run yesterday, and not be installed on the archive. Notice that the slowest arches where mips and hppa, all others completed in the first 5 hours following the upload or so. m68k followed the i386 build by less than 4 hours. I don't know though if it is enough to have the packages in the archive, or if they have also to be manually installed or something for some arches, but i don't think so. So i guess we can build the next round starting today evening after dinstall (usually around 20-21 hour european time), I would refrain from uploading huge packages at first, to make sure they don't stall the autobuilders while the smaller ones are getting through it, altough i guess this means coq only, not sure. As for me, i will upload today : camlzip, lablgl, spamoracle, ledit, mlgtk. > Since Samuel's ordering script has us at 5 levels, even if we waited a > full day, that's still < 1 week. I guess that the first level, only ocaml really needs to be uploaded, since it shows : upload: tuareg-mode upload: ocaml-doc upload: ocaml upload: hevea-doc upload: coq-doc I ask you to check individual packages during the adaptation for problems though. Also, there are some packages smimou's script did miss, and i will go through the uploaded Sources and Packages file soon to extract them in a couple of day, but please post them here if you meet any such packages. But indeed, it will probably be built in a week or two if we do it right. > We should probably coordinate who uploads which package(at least for the > group maintained one). Perhaps just announce on IRC in #d-o-m? I think most of them have a primary maintainer who will do the uploads. > Should the uploads be urgency medium as well? Yep, that would probably be best. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
