On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 12:36:29AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 01:55:43PM +0200, Sven wrote: > > But then, we have to remember that this version is the one who will be in > > stable, for at least 6 month, if not 1-2 years, depending of if we manage to > > shorten our release cycle or not, and it will make no good if the version in > > stable is incompatible with the current ocaml version, see what happens with > > potato. > > I know, but I definitely prefer stable ocaml 3.02 (!!??!!) in woody > than beta ocaml 3.03. To easy the use of ocaml 3.03 in future stable > anyway is sufficient to make package using stuff available in stable. > All packages of mine, for example, depends on debhelper 2.x and not on > debhelper 3.x. This is some times boring (think about files in /etc > automagically marked as conffiles) but I think that is really usefull.
So, woody, unless it is delayed a lot, in which case we can take further decisions about it, will ship with ocaml 3.02. I will then not worry too much about 3.03 before the freeze. That said i don't really understand the rest of what you say here. Friendly, Sven Luther
