On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 01:34:58PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote: > Sven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > No, i do no such thing, since ocaml has as source package the plain > > unmodified > > upstream tarball (ocaml-3.04.tar.gz), while i did a small source package for > > the documentation, regrouping all the different documentation files > > available > > separatedly (dvi, txt, ps, pdf, info and man). > > How was the documentation managed in the previous versions of the package? > There was no documentation in the main tarball?
NO, it hasd ever been done so, as should be ... > > It would have been easier if we had the upstream latex source, but they > > don't > > want to release it. > > Why don't they want to release the html source? Because they don't want people to modify them, i think. (html is available, just not the latex one) Friendly, Sven Luther
